Facebook Fanbox 1.5.x.0

Follow us on Twitter
China in Africa E-mail
Written by Chandler Grigg   
Monday, 01 March 2010 17:55

For hundreds of years the continent of Africa has been the scene of destitute poverty, deadly disease, and destructive war. Western powers are often blamed for the miserable state of affairs seen throughout most of the continent and pay massive reparations to support impoverished African nations.  Although Western governments contribute foreign aid to poverty-stricken Africa, they simultaneously allow Western businesses to take advantage of unfair trade policies. In contrast, the Chinese have embarked on what is one of the most brilliant, yet under-appreciated, geopolitical campaigns of our time—and in so doing, they are changing the African landscape.

China’s place in the global economy has been a vocal point for decades, but never so much as in the past few years. In its surprising transition from “developing” to “developed,” China has almost single-handedly shifted the global power focus toward Asia. American fears have largely been pacified by the fact that, because they were buying up large amounts of treasury bonds, the Yuan would be worthless if anything catastrophic happened to the U.S. economy. Aware of their economic dependence on Western trade, China reached out for alternative markets to balance out the Western role. One of their most successful ventures was in Africa.

China has several advantages in developing Africa. Democratically elected leaders must present a good image or risk losing their next election. They cannot afford to be seen supporting dictators. As dictators rule many of world’s poorest nations, foreign aid programs are notoriously plagued with corruption and inefficiency. China’s authoritarian government has no need to worry about constituents or popularity ratings, however. Whereas Western countries always try to condition their assistance on compliance to human rights regulations, the first principle of Chinese foreign aid is mutual respect for national sovereignty. This has increased cooperation among leaders and has contributed to operational efficiency. Also, Chinese workers are far better suited to the local conditions. While Western workers consider African assignments difficult, Chinese workers are relatively comfortable. Though importing Chinese labor has not helped local unemployment in Africa, new roads, bridges, manufacturing facilities, and refineries are rapidly improving the local economies. In fact, China has had more success developing Africa since 2000 than the West has had since 1800. African children are dropping English and French studies in favor of Chinese. Cleaning up the West’s mess in Africa is giving China significant political capital, as well as access to vast amounts of resources.

The effects of these development projects are far-reaching. Because of its assets in and around the horn of Africa, China has reason to police the waters of the Arabian Gulf for Somali pirates. This gave it a legitimate excuse to build up its Navy, which added significant strength to the Chinese military. Had China done this without pretext, the international community would have fiercely protested. Justified by the need to protect its interests in Africa, however, it received warm thanks for its support against piracy. This also allowed China to appear to be a more responsible member of the international community, and to gain greater political credibility.

In 2008, as the economies of most of the world began to decline rapidly, China was able to weather the crisis without as much difficulty. Because it had diversified its economy, its fate was not tied to that of the United States. True, China also has many successful contracts in Russia and Central Asia, but its most vital capital development has been in Africa, where it now has a significant presence in 49 of the continent’s countries.

By developing Africa, China has not only revitalized much of the continent, but it has also done much to secure its own future. Whereas Western countries have only thus far managed to get caught in quagmires, the Chinese have shown the world that they could accomplish what the West could only discuss. In so doing, China has also legitimately increased its military and political power and obtained far greater economic stability. If Western nations should choose to follow China’s model, then China will, most incredibly, have managed to bring African development back into vogue.

Chandler is a junior studying political science.

 


Last Updated on Monday, 01 March 2010 18:06
 

Comments  

 
0 #1 Luke 2010-03-02 05:13
So, should America drop all conditions on foreign dictators and shamelessly support dictators as long as we get some money and business deals out of it? For instance, China sells millions in weapons to Zimbabwe and has propped up its repressive government while it crushed internal dissent and killed hundreds. Should America drop conditions and try to step into the market in a similar way or keep up the sanctions to this murderous regime? Another instructive example is Gabon. After the massacre last year of 150 peaceful protestors, China signed a multi-million dollar contract with Gabon's military government. It was almost as if China was rewarding them for the massacre. The West took the high road and imposed economic sanctions on the regime. However, China's shameless money-making schemes took the edge off of our punishment. China needs to be a responsible member of the international community and impose similar sanctions on dictators and we should not be praising their role in Africa. By supporting dangerous states in Africa for economic gain, China is undermining the region as a whole. China's actions are setting back the clock on democratic and human right's reform in Africa and this is not a good development for anyone.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Valerie Hudson 2010-03-02 19:04
Yes, the Chinese are playing their hand well. Good analysis, Mr. Grigg.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Chandler 2010-03-08 17:45
Luke, thankful for giving me opportunity to clarify my position. I hope you did not read into my article an advocation of Chinese action. My hope was to present a strictly objective and nonpartisan analysis of the situation as it stands and to indicate the highlights of the Chinese strategy. I'm saying that the Chinese are being smart, not that they're being good. Again, thank you for your feedback.
Mrs. Hudson, thank you for your comment. I've missed having you this semester. I hope your classes are treating you well.
Quote
 
 
0 #4 Luke Miller 2010-03-11 01:41
I didn't think you were supporting Chinese policy. Actually, I thought it was a very good thoughtful article. However, I believe that there is another, darker side to Chinese policy that was ignored in the letter. I believe that China is having a net negative impact on the continent and I was merely trying to bring some of these problems to light. Thanks to Chinese support of pariah states and undemocratic forces, China is fostering instability and economically problematic regimes. Even if China is bringing about short term economic gain in Africa, by supporting dictatorships and future wars, China is causing long term problems and blocking needed reform. Chinese relatively small amount of investment will be quickly offset by the instability that its policies are engendering.
Quote
 
 
0 #5 Molly Cozzens 2010-03-18 06:43
Excellent analysis of strategy from the Chinese viewpoint - for example, I'd never considered how a military buildup would only be acceptable to other superpowers under such conditions as the predicament near the Horn of Africa.

One question: "China has had more success developing Africa since 2000 than the West has had since 1800." How do you quantify "success" and "development" here?
Quote
 
 
-1 #6 outofasia 2010-03-26 12:50
So, should America drop all conditions on foreign dictators? --Yes. Sometimes dictators do good. And it's none of America's damned business anyway. It always amazes that people from a country that operated the Jim Crow system in my lifetime have the gall to lecture Africans on governance. Thank goodness for China, a country that actually does stuff instead of just preaching.
Investment is nearly always good. Boycotts are nearly always stupid.
Quote
 
 
0 #7 Chandler 2010-04-03 18:14
Molly, thank you for your comment. To answer your question the statement was, admittedly, not meant so much for close critical analysis as it was simply meant for the contrasting effect. That having been said, the statement could, potentially, be qualified as sustained stability and economic development. That's what I had in mind at least while writing it.

Outofasia, thank you for your comment. Your viewpoint is valid and you are certainly not alone in that viewpoint. I would just like to reassert that I am not making a moral judgment, either of advocation or of denouncement of the Chinese strategy in this article. To re-emphasize, I am not saying that the Chinese strategy is "good" on a moral level, only that it is "smart" on a geopolitical level.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

 

byupas
byupas: Capitol Hill employees owed $9.3 million in back taxes last year, data show http://ow.ly/2BWck

38 minute(s) ago

byupas
byupas: US soldiers 'killed Afghan civilians for sport and collected fingers as trophies' http://bit.ly/9LdN3V

1 hour(s) ago

byupas
byupas: #BYU is true to Sabbath Day observance http://ow.ly/2BIoN

2 hour(s) ago

byupas
byupas: What Ever Happened to Obama's Army? (via @time) http://ow.ly/2BW9c

2 hour(s) ago


powered by TweetXT!